Technology Project Planning – Too Much of a Good Thing


I recently debated with a generation consultant friend who knows I am big on content and elements within assignment-making plans and the contracts that aid a generation deal. We located ourselves speaking approximately that precept of economics called the regulation of diminishing marginal returns. His point was that for undertaking proprietors planning new venture-accumulating requirements, fleshing out specs, polling person options, etc., the regulation of diminishing marginal returns sets in plenty earlier than they comprehend. The resources spent all through the preliminary planning stages produce some hefty returns. But quickly after, spending an equal quantity of help again and the next time after will have smaller and smaller chunks of advantage. When you are caught up in a making plans method, it is frequently hard to discover the factor at which your price-advantage curve has all started to flatten.


What my buddy was announcing seemed plausible, and because I no longer had any evidence of the opposite, I understood his concept. Then I thought of a probable outcome of his idea, and I said, “You’re no longer going to exit and start spreading this concept around the era network, are you?” My worry becomes this. Here turned into me, this evangelist of content and element, and throughout the table, became a fellow who may want to undermine the beyond. My project’s Destiny progressed through telling oldsters they need less planning and essential questioning for their era projects and now not greater. Project proprietors’ making plans and thinking is, in any case, what generates the content material and detail I crave and have come to respect.

We talked some more, and my friend added a few explanations. As it turns out, he was that assignment proprietors do not waste money and time planning what cannot be deliberated effectively at a particular time. Made experience. I was squirming; however, I am now a chunk relieved. You are determined to apply a staged or iterative technique to your subsequent challenge. You will purchase some Off-The-Shelf software and customize it for an honest amount. Phase 1 may involve extending a discrete element of present capability and then wiring to a live database for some checking out.

In this example, there’s no point in thinking via the information of Phases 2 through five or estimating prices within those stages, besides in either case at a high degree, because 1) unless Phase 1 is completed smoothly and with an appropriate price, you will never get to the following levels. A pair of) you haven’t yet examined your assumptions about costing within Phase 1. Indeed, you possibly chose an iterative approach for this mission due to your inability to plan your assignment efficaciously from start to finish.

Less apparent examples

My buddy and I talked a few extra, and we moved beyond the obvious examples, the ones that can be smooth to accept. My herbal reaction changed to resist any further extension of his idea because I knew he might be reducing closer and towards the bone, threatening the very foundation of my evangelist challenge. However, sitting before me became a whiny character and a clear thinker, with almost many years of enjoyment with generation. I needed to listen (nervously). “When the pupil is prepared to research, the instructor will seem.”

Requirements accumulating – A right issue, no doubt, and something the experts had been encouraging us to do extra during the last ten years. “Insufficient necessities development stated as the main reason for project failure.” When it involves necessities, we have been led to accept as true that more isn’t sufficient. Surely, there may be a point at which extra requirements aren’t beneficial (and can also be adverse). However, the professionals have not told us how to determine just while we’ve grown to become the corner.


As much as I resisted this discussion’s glide with my buddy, I must admit that what he pronounces made an ideal experience. But now I needed to discover some way to reconcile divergent standards: on the one hand, my lengthy-held belief that extra assignment making plans and vital wondering ought to always be one’s aspiration, and on the other, my awareness which you virtually can have too much of an amazing component.

Ultimately, I located the reconciliation I needed with just one perception. It happened to me that, with all of the speakers and literature obtainable telling us to interact in more best practices for our technology projects and extra regularly, we’ve become conditioned to believe that different is not enough reality due to the nature of the beast, more can in no way be enough. We have been doing it increasingly, and the incremental enhancements we’ve witnessed and the brand-new articles we read inspire us to continue doing more. Of course, our aim is ideal, but can we stop doing more? When should we stop doing greater?

It’s all relative.

I suppose all of it boils down to relativity- your relative sophistication as a technology customer and the close nature of your precise venture. If you started heeding the specialists’ advice a few years ago, your approach to shopping for technology might be pretty sophisticated with the aid of now. You can be doing the correct stage of planning your initiatives, and maybe you do an excessive amount of every so often. Other agencies are beginning their eyes to a higher manner, perhaps precipitated by the latest elaborate challenge.

Second, when enough is sufficient depends on your precise task. You intend to plan successfully and carefully for all aspects of your job, but consider that your present need or ability to devise positive factors may not yet exist. Further, even when you have the prevailing need and ability to plan a certain thing of your undertaking, do no longer overdo it. For instance, do not continue to feature increasing necessities in your requirements basket as if quantity were your handiest purpose.

On this remaining point, remember that requirements, specs, consumer possibilities, and each other item for your task-planning list have at least one factor in common. Once you have thought of them and cemented them into a few spreadsheets, they have a way of placing around at some point in your making plans procedure and frequently completing your venture. Instead of being ready to whack a number of those hangers-on closer to the end of a phase or at the quiet of your project (“backward creep” of scope or deliverables), attempt to prioritize them at an early stage of your task. You will not open Requirements Container 2 until the excessive-precedence requirements in Container 1 are exhausted (happy or intentionally discarded). A prioritization technique ought to prevent time, dollars, and other resources.



It can be pleasant for many of us not to permit the passing of our conditioned response to the project, making plans and essential wondering- not just yet, anyway. The conditioning represents a standard effective motivation. Its underlying motive is generating outcomes. Our era procurement method, including its planning element, may also have much room for development. The extra state-of-the-art technology customers among us would possibly need to put the brakes on the conditioned response a piece. Regardless of what camp you are in (and until similarly be aware from the professionals!), beat the least mindful of the truth that there’s the sort of component as an excessive amount of project making plans. I, for one, am now a believer.